Amazon.com Widgets
The Linde

Latest post:

Frances Chesterton, kindred spirit | Katie van Schaijik

Reading Ian Ker’s biography of G.K. Chesterton this morning, I learned some things about his beloved wife, Frances.  For one, she was prone to depression; grey, wet weather effected her terribly.  Yet her faith was deep and true, and essentially personalistic.

Here is Fr. Ker, quoting from her journal:

Unlike her husband, who enjoyed rain and grey skies, Frances felt like a new person ‘because the sun is shining’, which made her feel ‘warm with the thought of all I have and warmer with the thought of all I am going to have and warmest of all with the thought that Love thought well to include me in his list of favored persons’.

Add comment

Other recent posts:

    • Public morality and the common good
    • Validating feelings
    • Choice and borderline personality disorder
    • A personalist approach to Natural Family Planning
    • Fr. John Courtney Murray
    • Christmas meditation
    • Humbug
    • A feast of beauty brought to you by mind-blowing technology
    • Advent souls
    • Should we say “no” to facebook?

Join our mailing list:

  

Membership

The present age is a time of great controversy about the human being, controversy about the very meaning of human existence, and thus about the nature and significance of the human being. We know that such situations in history have frequently led to a deeper reflection on Christian truth as a whole, as well as on particular aspects of it. That is also the case today. The truth about the human being, in turn, has a distinctly privileged place in this whole process. After nearly twenty years of ideological debate in Poland, it has become clear that at the center of this debate is not cosmology or philosophy of nature but philosophical anthropology and ethics: the great and fundamental controversy about the human being.

Karol Wojtyla, The Person: Subject and Community